Slumlord
Jenny Konkin Speaks!
Or
Is it possible that this Ms. Jenny Konkin small Convicted Vancouver
Slumlord is simply a worthless human being?
(or
world wide scoop)
DATELINE
zedzzhedsezz.blogspot.ca
or:
the who, what, when
This
tedium is beginning to wear upon zezzhedsezz.blogspot.ca and it is
time to bounce the ball for all to follow.
The
Slumlord
Starting
at the bottom of the barrel where all the scum sticks: This
slumlord, this Ms. Jenny Konkin (no photo)(and her brother).
This
Ms. Konkin has learned to systematically victimize the poor tenants
who provide her wealth. (see: a photo array)
This
Ms. Konkin has learned to defraud the Provincial Government of
British Columbia; to steal tax dollars with impunity.
This
Ms. Konkin has learned how to commit perjury.
This
Ms. Konkin has been in contempt of court for 671 days to date.
All
of this in thirty short years. Quite a comprehensive education.
The
real reason for the aggrandizement of this slumlord is as follows:
This
slumlord, this Ms. Jenny Konkin has begun a (sic) charity supposedly
for the poor. This Ms. Jenny Konkin knows how to victimize the poor.
This Ms. Jenny Konkin knows how commit fraud and steal. This Ms.
Jenny Konkin knows how to lie and is willing to commit perjury.
Is
this slumlord, this Ms. Jenny Konkin the type of person you would
trust with charitable funds? How much more could this slumlord
steal?
Sinking
into the scum
Is
a Ms. Jenny Konkin small Convicted Vancouver Slumlord a Media Bully?
There
is an implicit trust between the media and the public. This trust is
the guarantee that the media will publish the facts. Ethics 101, the
journalism schools will confirm. This trust means that the media
will not publish speculation. This trust means that the media will
not publish lies.
Occasionally
an interviewee may not tell the truth, withhold information. The
journalism schools can confirm that the first lesson in responsible
reporting is to always check the facts, to take nothing on faith.
This results in ethical journalism, journalism with integrity.
On
15 September 2013 The Pacific Newspaper Group (under The Province
banner) published a feel good story about this Ms. Jenny Konkin.
Buried at the end of the article is the plug for the (sic) charity.
This is an obvious ploy but the fact that the facts were not printed
was stunning.
I
informed the Pacific Newspaper Group of the facts that same day.
(see: Is This Good Journalism?) I informed the Pacific Newspaper
Group in three more letters over another two days.
Any
responsible media outlet, with ethics, would check the facts. Any
responsible media outlet would, if the facts merited it, print a
retraction and a public apology. Responsibility is another part of
the implicit trust and ethics upon which responsible journalism is
founded. (query journalism schools again)
The
Pacific Newspaper Group chose ignore and to suppress the facts. The
Pacific Newspaper Group (under The Province banner) chose to publish
lies.
By
not doing the ethical thing the Pacific Newspaper Group becomes
complicit in the criminal activities of this Ms. Jenny Konkin. They
obviously support her slumlord activities, victimizing the poor
tenants, stealing tax dollars and committing perjury.
One
must ask if the article was purchased..
One
must ask if the same lack of ethics and integrity extends to the rest
of the Pacific Newspaper Group: The National Post, The Edmonton
Journal, The Calgary Herald, The Winnipeg Free Press, The Vancouver
Sun. Do all of these media outlets aid and abet slumlords, suppress
facts and publish lies?
The
complicity with this slumlord, this Ms. Jenny Konkin at the Pacific
Newspaper Group includes: Kent Spencer (reporter), ------ (faith
editor), Paul Chapman (editor-in-Chief), Mr. Gordon Fisher
(publisher) and the rest of the Pacific Newspaper Group board of
directors. Not one of you have shown ethics nor integrity in this.
Shame
on you. Shame on all of you.
Vancouver
Metro News (floating microscopic
masthead) had the facts on 18 September 2013. On 25 September 2013
this 'media' outlet chose to publish a possibly well researched feel
good article on the front page. Not one relevant fact was published.
This slumlord, this Ms. Jenny Konkin's (sic) charity was featured in
a box with banner. Another obvious ploy.
By
not publishing a single fact Vancouver Metro News printed lies by
omission. The maybe-no-one-will-know-I-was-bad method of printing
actual lies.
One
must ask if the article was purchased. Does the entire Metro Group
aid and abet slumlords, suppress facts and print lies?
The
'mast head' is impossible to read. You find out who to blame. None
the less.
Shame
on you. Shame on all of you.
Sinking,
sinking and sinking
A
Large Part of the Media in Canada
including:
CBC Canada, CTV Broadcasting, newspapers in all major and some
smaller markets (see: contact list growing concern)
I
published the story about this slumlord, this Ms. Jenny Konkin here
(zedzzhedsezz: world wide scoop) on 18 September 2013. I sent the
facts to you. From Victoria to St. John's. Some media outlets make
contact difficult. I had hoped to find some integrity in journalism.
(query journalism schools for the meaning of integrity) Surely one
media outlet would report the truth.
In
July 2012, ten months after my initial contact, CBC Go Public Ms.
Kathy Tomlinson contacted me stating that the CBC would finally go
public and broadcast the story. The next contact was to inform me
that Go Public was after a different slumlord. Why?
The
facts are public record. Not one fact was printed. Not one query
regarding the facts. (one volunteer radio outlet did admire the
detail in: Is This Good Journalism?)
Silence.
Is
this the media equivalent of the 'thin blue line'? Were reporters
frightened to do their job? Were the facts being suppressed by
editors and owners? (see: Is a Ms. Jenny Konkin small Vancouver
Slumlord a Media Bully?)
Silence
is complicity.
Not
one of you did your job. How can the public respect anything you
print or broadcast after this?
Shame
on you. Shame on all of you.
Is
a Ms. Jenny Konkin small Convicted Vancouver Slumlord a Political
Bully?
How
does a slumlord with the above record manage to register a (sic)
charity?
In
October 2011 I met a worker at the Dockside Welfare Office regarding
illegal rooms..
In
October 2011 I called the tax hot line regarding the illegal
restaurant.
The
Honorable Christy Clark, Premier of British Columbia received most
of the evidence on October 7, 2011. A promised form never delivered.
(no promised investigation – obvious ploy)
Why?
The
Honorable Adrian Dix, Leader of the Loyal Provincial Opposition, the
Honorable Stephanie Cadieux, Minister of Social Development received
most of the evidence the same day. (no reply)
Why?
The
Honorable Jenny Kwan was contacted in early 2012 with all of the
evidence. I received the brushoff.
Through
the Honorable Ms. Kwan I received a letter on 4 July 2012.
Serendipity had placed all of the evidence on the exact desk for
which it was meant. The Honorable Stephanie Cadiuex, Cabinet
Minister for Social Development instructed me to go to the back of
the line.
Why?
The
Honorable Prime Minister of Canada/The Honorable Leader of the
Opposition Party of Canada/The Honorable Leader of the Bloc
Quebecois/ The Honorable Leader of The New Democratic Party:
Slumlords
are universal. Slumlords are in every village, town and city in
every consituency in Canada. Slumlords feed on the poor. Slumlords
are not nice people.
Who
is protecting this slumlord? Why?
Honorable
Gentlemen I am asking you as men: Is this not now news?
My
name is Peter Bracking; one man (no dog)
None would be reading
this if the Pacific Newspaper Group did not publish lies.
All would be in the cold
if the slumlord had turned on the heat.
-30-
(is
the heat on)
on
social media
Do you
think slumlords should pay for their crimes?
click
and help the poor
zedzzhedsezz.blogspot.ca
search
Jenny
Konkin Convicted Slumlord